Index relies entirely on the support of donors and readers to do its work.
Help us keep amplifying censored voices today.
Government attempts to clamp down on sectarian abuse and violence are a recipe for uncertainty and censorship, says David Paton
Stephen Birrell seems like a pretty unpleasant bloke. He has a conviction for attacking his girlfriend with a machete. Now he’s got another conviction, for posting sectarian remarks on a Facebook page. Birrell has been sentenced to eight months in jail.
The page in question is “Neil Lennon should be banned” — a kind of anti-tribute to the Celtic Football Club manager who inspires particular loathing among Glasgow Rangers fans.
If the reports are correct, then Birrell has not been sentenced because of threats against Lennon, of which there have been many serious examples this year. Rather it has been for admittedly crude comments about Fenians, “tattie farmers” and the rest, stuff that lies somewhere between football banter and genuine hate speech.
Birrell’s sentence, alarming as it is, comes even before legislation specifically outlawing football related “hate speech” comes into force.
Read Judith Townend on the contentious Offensive Behaviour at Football and Threatening Communications Bill here
As the trial against a man accused of making a religiously aggravated attack against Celtic manager Neil Lennon continues, Judith Townend examines the Scottish bill intended to legislate against sectarianism and offensive behaviour at football matches