NEWS
Tom Carter: No-platforming Nigel

Index on Censorship youth advisory board member Tom Carter explains why he thinks no-platforming undermines free expression

17 Aug 2015
BY INDEX ON CENSORSHIP

This is the second of a series of posts written by members of Index on Censorship’s youth advisory board.

Members of the board were asked to write a blog discussing one free speech issue in their country. The resulting posts exhibit a range of challenges to freedom of expression globally, from UK crackdowns on speakers in universities, to Indian criminal defamation law, to the South African Film Board’s newly published guidelines.


Tom Carter is a member of the Index youth advisory board. Learn more

Tom Carter is a member of the Index youth advisory board. Learn more

Universities are meant to be institutions that embody the spirit of free expression. They are places where new ideas are formulated and environments where students are exposed to a range of viewpoints. However, whilst freedom of expression in universities is under threat from government intervention, another threat to freedom of expression on UK campuses is originating from the students themselves.

In October 2014, UKIP’s Nigel Farage was invited by the University of Cambridge’s politics department to give an address on an undisclosed topic. This prompted two independent Facebook campaigns, one of which was from the Cambridge University Students’ Union Women’s Campaign imploring Cambridge to rescind the invitation, which it eventually was.

This is indicative of an increasing hostility among UK students towards the expression of ideas deemed unacceptable. Whether or not you agree or disagree with UKIP’s policies, they are the UK’s third largest party by vote share and very much constitute part of the political mainstream.

The fact that students are now willing to influence the speaker choices of universities is a worrying trend. Only by hearing views different to your own can your ideas be refined and fine-tuned and hearing policies expressed in public discussion is the only way to scrutinise them effectively.

Tom Carter, UK

Related:
Matthew Brown: Spying on NGOs a step too far
About the Index on Censorship youth advisory board
Facebook discussion: no-platforming of speakers at universities

3 responses to “Tom Carter: No-platforming Nigel”

  1. Ronald says:

    Having a platform is a separate issue from free speech.

    For example: I don’t have a platform to speak in the Daily Mail, and likely never will. Am I being censored?

    People buy (loss-making) newspapers and instruments of the press in order to control what is said on that platform. That is a difficult issue, but what you are suggesting is that other platforms are obliged to amplify that small group of voices. I believe this will only compound the problem that a whole range of voices goes unheard.

    To meet the demand that different views should be heard, student unions must provide a more diverse range of voices than those which are already over-represented in the traditional media.

  2. The same thing goes on in the USA (where I live), Tom. I blame it on liberal professors who are more interested in indoctrinating students than educating them.

  3. SmokedKipper says:

    Wasting your time. They won’t listen. Non progressive views are heresy to them.