Forecasting the Implications of the U.S. CLOUD Act Around the World

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_single_image image=”102691″ img_size=”full”][vc_column_text]

The U.S. CLOUD Act allows the Attorney General to present, for Congressional review, bilateral “executive agreements,” where s/he has certified that potential partner countries meet certain criteria, including regarding human rights. These agreements would allow partner countries to directly request electronic evidence from U.S.-based companies. This has the potential to provide incentives for enhanced rule-of-law and human rights protections in partner countries, as well as to create unintended consequences for users and internet governance.

Join us on September 18th for a discussion featuring several prominent GNI civil society, academic, and company members presenting their perspectives on the potential global implications of the U.S. CLOUD Act. Speakers include:

  • Professor Park Kyung-Sin (K.S. Park), Korea University School of Law (South Korea)
  • Elonnai Hickok, Chief Operating Officer, Center for Internet & Society (India)
  • Patrik Hiselius, Senior Advisor, Digital Rights, Telia Company (Sweden)
  • Jodie Ginsberg, Chief Executive Officer, Index on Censorship (UK)
  • David Bitkower, Partner, Jenner & Block LLP; former Principle Deputy Assistant Attorney General (Criminal Division), U.S. Department of Justice


When: 18 September 2018, 2-3:30 EDT
Where: Russell Senate Office Building, Room 188, Washington, DC 20002
Tickets: Free. Registration required.


Global Network Initiative addresses global delisting case


 The Global Network Initiative, of Index on Censorship is a participant, notes the decision by the French courts to refer the global internet search de-listing case to the Court of Justice of the European Union.

” This important case raises complex issues related to internationally protected rights to freedom of expression and privacy, and the ability of governments to assert jurisdiction beyond borders. We hope the Court will take the opportunity to carefully the consequences for human rights – not just in Europe, but around the world,” said Mark Stephens, CBE., GNI Independent Board Chair and international human rights lawyer.

“We are concerned that if a single jurisdiction can mandate the global removal of search information it sends a message to all governments – authoritarian and democratic – that they each can reach beyond their borders and restrict access to content which is perfectly lawful in other jurisdictions,” Mr. Stephens said.

“The unintended consequences for global delisting include countries passing laws that restrict global access to information such as criticism of leaders and governments, and content relating to religious and ethnic minorities, LGBT people and women’s health, ” he said.

In March 2016, Google appealed the ruling of the Commission Nationale de L’Informatique et des Libertes (CNIL), which requires that search results deemed subject to the “Right to be Forgotten” be blocked not just across the European Union, but globally.

GNI has been long concerned that a global de-listing mandate sets a disturbing precedent for the cause of an open and free internet, with consequences for global access to information and freedom of expression, including for journalists, academics and historians.

Index on Censorship has and will remain opposed to calls for global delisting of search results, calling the so-called right to be forgotten “a blunt instrument ruling that opens the door for widespread censorship”.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_basic_grid post_type=”post” max_items=”12″ style=”load-more” items_per_page=”4″ element_width=”6″ grid_id=”vc_gid:1500650961804-f6170a94-c2b4-2″ taxonomies=”3211″][/vc_column][/vc_row]

Dynamics of digital freedom

Index logo xLast week we hosted a conference with the Global Network Initiative (GNI), where we had a heated debate around surveillance, security, and freedom of expression. Check out the conversation here.