STATEMENT
France, Charlie Hebdo and the meaning of Mohammed
02 Nov 2011
BY INDEX ON CENSORSHIP

The Charlie Hebdo bombing exposes a gulf in understanding between the secular French establishments and Muslim immigrants, says Myriam Francois-Cerrah

The firebombing of Charlie Hebdo offices following its decision to run an edition featuring the prophet Mohammed as “guest editor”, is a sad reflection of France’s uneasy relationship to Islam and religion more generally.Sadly, there are some who do not believe that Charlie Hebdo should have the right to publish a satirical issue, in which it presents Prophet Mohamed as the inspiration of the Arab revolutions and subsequent rise of islamist parties in the region (regardless of the accuracy of this link!). They are no doubt in a minority, just as those who committed this crime will no doubt be revealed to be a fringe group or renegade individuals.

But there is no denying the fact many Muslims are offended by the decision to run an issue entitled “Charia Hebdo”, with reference to “100 lashings if you don’t die of laughter” (chuckle) and a “halal aperitif” (ha!) and perhaps more pertinently, to run images of Prophet Mohammed.

Charlie Hebdo is renowned for being a highly satirical outlet which pushes the limits of public discourse on any given issue through its provocative illustrations and irreverent style. It has in its time, been accused of being anti-Semitic, anti-Catholic and now Islamophobic to boot and would no doubt parade these accusations as badges of honour.

However the recent issue comes at a complex time in France’s political life. The far right has made large advances, gaining 15 per cent of the vote in recent regional elections and they have maintained the “immigration question” near the top of the political agenda, drawing parallels between Muslims praying in the street and the Nazi occupation. Meanwhile, recent stats suggest that amongst the descendants of immigrants, 70 per cent, compared with 35 per cent amongst recent immigrants, consider that the French government does not respect them, including amongst those possessing university degrees and thus in theory, more “integrated” into the social fabric.

French Arabs face unemployment at a rate of 14 per cent compared with 9.2 per cent amongst people of French origin — even after adjusting for educational qualifications and are poorly represented at every level. Charlie Hebdo’s decision to poke fun at Islam, although completely inline with its treatment of other issues, comes at a time of intense polemics over the place of Islam within France, as debates over “laicite” galvanise the political spectrum.

Many Muslims appear to feel under siege in a political climate which continues to view Islam as an impediment to full adhesion to French national identity and where religious practise is associated with a social malaise. Indeed, a recent report by the French academic Gilles Kepel has reignited debate over the role Islam plays in the perpetuation of disenfranchisement in the suburbs, where Muslims are over-represented.

Some in France have sought to blame Islam for the high levels of unemployment, underachievement, violence and marginalisation in France’s ghettoised suburbs, while others have protested the Islamification of the discourse on the suburbs, decrying the use of confused and loaded terminology to overlook substantial economic and social problems in these areas. In France, with or without the caricatures, Islam is a sore topic with many recent polemics related to Islamic practises, whether the face veil debate, street prayers or the building of new mosques.

French Muslims are regularly told — even by the President — that you either “love France or you leave her”, reinforcing their status as outsiders, and a right-wing discourse which promotes ridiculous predictions of a Muslim take over of Europe through high birth rates and proselytising, is gaining ground. Christopher Caldwell, a contributor to the Financial Times recently published an inflammatory book Reflections on the Revolution In Europe: Immigration, Islam, and the West which has gained widespread media coverage, including on mainstream French TV, with its thesis that Europe is doomed in the face of a Islamic cultural invasion. In this context, marked by fear of Islam’s alleged resurgence, intractability and incompatibility with “French culture”, as well as the inability of many French Muslims to present an alternative perspective on an equal platform, are the seeds of profound social malaise.

Satire of religion has a long history in France and Christians are not exempt from what some groups have deemed insensitive and injurious portrayals of sacred persons or ideas. Since its launch on 20 October, Christian groups have regularly interrupted the Paris based theatrical production of “On the concept of the face of the son of God” (Sur le concept du visage du fils de Dieu) for its perceived blasphemy and “Christianophobia”.

The play features an elderly man defecating on stage and his son coming to clean his back side, using the portrait of Jesus. The excrement collected is then used at the end of the play by children as missiles to be thrown at the portrait of Christ, whilst at the end of the production, a black veil of excrement glides down the portrait of Jesus. In April this year, an art exhibit entitled Piss Christ, featuring a crucifix immersed in a glass containing blood and urine was vandalised by Christians outraged by the piece. Some religious groups have accused the arts and the media to resorting to crass provocations to raise the profile of otherwise mediocre artistic endeavours which might not have garnered public attention without the controversy.

Charlie Hebdo’s current confrontation with Islamic polemics is not its first. In 2008, it won a legal case against accusations of incitement to racial hatred when it chose to reprint the Danish cartoons, launched by the French Muslim Council (CFCM) and the Grand Mosque of Paris. Interviewed on recent events, Mohammed Moussaoui, president of the CFCM has both condemned the attack on Charlie Hebdo and the printing of the irreverent images.

Describing the decision to print images known to be offensive to Muslims as “hurtful” and questioning the association of the caricatures of Prophet Mohamed with events in Tunisia or Libya, he defended the right of those who opposed the decision to protest as well as the freedom of the press to print the said images and explained that in a plural society, people’s relationship to the sacred will necessarily vary.

The attack on the press outlet, Charlie Hebdo is symptomatic of the broader unease French society is facing in light of a growing visible Muslim minority. While successive generations of “French” origin are getting more secular in their outlook, with around 60 per cent of youths saying in 2008 that they had no religious belief, the pattern among the children of immigrants from north Africa, Sahel and Turkey is the opposite, as religion gains in importance, particularly among the young.

How France negotiates an inclusive public sphere in which the views of all its citizens, including those who abide by a religious tradition, are reflected remains a stark challenge. It is telling that Charlie Hebdo chose Mohammed as “guest editor”, rather than a contemporary figure who could express an accurate reflection of French Muslim opinion on current affairs — instead, it chose the route of ease, ascribing archaic and reactionary ideas to a sacred figure, his ideas rigidified and frozen in a literalist caricature, which although undoubtedly humorous in parts, is completely out of sync with how most Muslims understand Islam’s relationship to the modern context. This issue might be its best-selling; the real question though ought to be, is it its best?

Myram Francois-Cerrah is a writer, journalist and budding academic

14 responses to “France, Charlie Hebdo and the meaning of Mohammed”

  1. […] The Satanic Verses and free speech and Why free expression is now seen as an enemy of libertySara Yasin on France, Charlie Hebdo and the meaning of MohammedWhen we succumb to notions of religious offence, we stifle debate, writes Salil TripathiSherry […]

  2. […] Sara Yasin on France, Charlie Hebdo and the meaning of Mohammed […]

  3. […] contributing editor of The New RepublicAlso read:Kenan Malik on The Satanic Verses and free speechSara Yasin on France, Charlie Hebdo and the meaning of MohammedWhen we succumb to notions of religious offence, we stifle debate, writes Salil TripathiWhy are UK […]

  4. […] Index On Censorship opublikowała opinie dwóch naukowców w Stanach Zjednoczonych i w Wielkiej Brytanii dotyczące sytuacji, w jakiej […]

  5. GeoffP says:

    “It is telling that Charlie Hebdo chose Mohammed as “guest editor”, rather than a contemporary figure who could express an accurate reflection of French Muslim opinion on current affairs — instead, it chose the route of ease, ascribing archaic and reactionary ideas to a sacred figure, his ideas rigidified and frozen in a literalist caricature, which although undoubtedly humorous in parts, is completely out of sync with how most Muslims understand Islam’s relationship to the modern context.”

    Er, as in Egypt, Iran, Saudi Arabia, Tunisia, Morocco, Turkey, Iraq, Malaysia, Indonesia, Pakistan, Afghanistan, the Sudan, Nigeria, Palestine, Syria, India, Libya, Algeria, the Balkans and Kuwait?

    Did you mean to invoke the surely overwhelming predominance of liberalist attitudes in those countries to homosexuals, women, socialists and religious minorities? Perhaps the gaining importance of religion in the lives of Muslim youth will bear this supposition out in short order, but any rational person would laugh at such a postulation.

  6. Laura Kneen says:

    Why do certain Muslims get to decide what millions of other Muslims around the world find offensive?

  7. kim says:

    Fundamentalist Muslims are telling non Muslims what they should and should not write. It is none of their business. Pictures of Mohammed were common throughout the Islamic World in days gone by. Many western fundamentalist Muslims today want everyone Muslim or non Muslim to abide by their rules, and in extreme cases, firebomb and even try to kill those who don’t do what they say. These people should move back to Islamic countries that have Shariah law.

  8. […] Also read: Sara Yasin and Myriam Francois-Cerrah on France, Charlie Hebdo and the meaning of Mohammed […]

  9. […] on censorship has published two views of the Charlie Hebdo crisis, providing insights from  two academics  in the United States and in […]

  10. […] on censorship has published two views of the Charlie Hebdo crisis, providing insights from  two academics  in the United States and in […]

  11. love says:

    To the lady who refers to the “crazy Muslim”…You too, my dear, write very Good English.
    But, you have still not been able to understand the point…Free your hard heart, then feel and then write down your thoughts…

    I don’t stand for violence, I am totally against it in any form — I believe that in retaliation every Muslim, who had their hearts broken when hearing of this new piece of blasphemy against the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon his soul), should go into a few minutes of isolation and pray to our Creator to soften the hearts of those responsible for putting their thoughts to paper – or electronic media – so that they too can see and understand the point.. In our quest to sell papers, or receive an overwhelming response of people coming on to our websites, we should start writing with spirit and good intention for bringing the world together.

    I am not condemning you Sara or Myriam… I advise you to contemplate your motive and intention before clicking on the publish button.

    Best wishes to you both..

  12. love says:

    As academic, well-written and factual as your points are about picking on Christ and other events…this is the point…it is a WELL-KNOWN fact that Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon his soul) chose not to be pictured throughout his precious life on Earth.
    Muslims, who truly and sincerely feel that special love and respect for their Messenger (pbuh), will feel the terrible pain in their beings, when viewing such a despicable caricature of Rasullallah (Saw)…because they are well aware over the centuries that he did NOT want to be pictured or have a portrait done…this is simply the point…which most Muslims are trying to bring people to understanding..
    Publishing a carefully put together article to make a point is noble of you, but the truth once again I reiterate simply, there should be no justification of utilising any form of a picture to illustrate Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon his soul). If there is truth in the point that is trying to be made, then just get STRAIGHT to the point Charlie Hebdo and every other form of media. There is absolutely no need to include precious souls to make a reader appreciate something a mere mortal is writing whoever you are.
    There are limits to expressing your freedom of expression and one should not overstep the boundaries – even if they are imaginery boundaries set by God – just to create havoc and sell more copies.
    What is the aim of this world at present…to make sense of all non-sense so that we all go home and sleep well at night knowing the articles we wrote were simply off-the-hook and the copies of our publication were sold like hotcakes fresh off the press..If this is your life, then it is a sad one which needs introspection and Light to enter it.. I am very sure that Charlie Hebdo will sell more copies than they ever did now, and wouldn’t have t close due to a drop in sales, because they were well aware that using Nabi (saw) would be the best advertising for them to get sales from both the “Islamic” fanatic, the lover of Islam and the supporters of their lack-of-fear-of-God reportage. I’d like to conclude by saying to you, well done, you write well and are able to use facts in a good sequence to make your writing sound balanced, intelligent and objective – a tip as well, get rid of your hard heart and understand and feel the love for those special souls who walked this Earth, like I do, and then you wouldn’t be able to put facts together and just publish, you will feel and write with your soul. Set it free..

  13. omega says:

    my name is omeag from ghana i hane my own movie production

  14. […] The Charlie Hebdo bombing exposes a gulf in understanding between the secular French establishments … […]