LETTER
Letter: Crime and Courts Act 2013 danger to free press
25 Oct 2016
BY INDEX ON CENSORSHIP

The following letter was published in The Times on 25 October 2016.

Sir,
The Crime and Courts Act 2013, as it stands, is a danger to a free press. Under the act, a publisher can be ordered to pay both sides’ costs in a dispute if the publisher is not a member of an approved regulator.

Index on Censorship has fought for free speech since 1972, and as publishers ourselves, we will not join a regulator that has to be approved by a body created by the state. This means we – and many other small publishers – could face crippling costs in any dispute, threatening investigative journalism or those who challenge the powerful or the wealthy.

Index has called for cheaper mediation in press disputes as we, like Impress funder Max Moseley and Impress chair, Walter Merricks, believe this is better for free speech. Where we disagree is in the need for a regulator to be recognised by a panel appointed via the state – or for law that makes it, in effect, compulsory to join an approved regulator or face punitive costs.

Yours sincerely,
Jodie Ginsberg
CEO, Index on Censorship

Contents – China’s global brand: a century of silencing dissent

Illustration: Badiucao Index looks back on 100 years of the Chinese Communist Party and how their censorship laws continue to shape the lives of people around the world and threaten their right to free speech. Inside this edition are articles by exiled writer Ma Jian and an interview with Facebook's vice-president for global affairs, former [...]

Urgent action is needed to defend our media

As the 2021 Council of Europe Platform report is published, Index on Censorship and its partners call for the urgent implementation of the report’s recommendations

Russia: Index expresses concern over the arrest of Doxa journalists

Student journalism is a building block of media freedom, says Index CEO

What price press freedom in Northern Ireland?

Journalists continue to be threatened as tensions escalate in the province

Comments are closed.