Subverting Censorship

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]

(Photo illustration: Shutterstock)

Celebrate fifty years since the abolishment of theatre censorship in Britain and the Hays Code in American cinema.

To commemorate these anniversaries, join cultural professionals, including Index on Censorship CEO Jodie Ginsberg, academics and artists for an exploration into the ways in which the arts have both conformed, and actively confronted censorship. You’ll discover how codes of what constitutes immoral or obscene material have shifted over time – looking at examples of film, theatre, performance, paintings, prints, and the role of museums and galleries.

This day-long event takes place at the Victoria and Albert Museum.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]

When: Saturday, 21 April 2018 10:00–17:00
Where: Hochhauser Auditorium, Victoria and Albert Museum, Cromwell Road, London, SW7 2RL
Tickets: £15.00 – £25.00 via V&A

[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]

Turkey reporter stayed one step ahead of crackdown

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]This article is part of Index on Censorship partner Global Journalist’s Project Exile series, which has published interviews with exiled journalists from around the world.[/vc_column_text][vc_single_image image=”97954″ img_size=”full” add_caption=”yes” alignment=”center”][vc_column_text]In hindsight, there were many clues that President Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s government was making preparations to eliminate Turkey’s independent media even before it launched a massive crackdown in July 2016. But perhaps the biggest tip-off was the March 2016 police raid and seizure of Zaman, Turkey’s largest daily newspaper.

At the time, Abdullah Bozkurt was bureau chief in the capital Ankara for the paper’s English-language edition, Today’s Zaman. On March 4 of that year, Bozkurt found himself struggling to put out the newspaper’s final edition – even as he watched on live television as police in riot gear fired tear gas and water cannons on protesters and stormed Zaman’s headquarters 220 miles (350 km) to the west in Istanbul.

Shortly before court-appointed trustees seized control of the newspaper’s computer system, Bozkurt wrote the headline for the last cover of Today’s Zaman. “Shameful Day for Free Press in Turkey,” it read. “Zaman Media Group Seized.”

Zaman had been in Erdogan’s crosshairs for some time for its sympathies with the Gülen movement, an opposition group affiliated with a U.S.-based Islamic cleric that Erdogan has branded a “terrorist” organization. It had particularly angered the government for its aggressive coverage of a 2013 corruption investigation that led to the arrests of three sons of ministers in  then-prime minister Erdogan’s government, Bozkurt says.

“Initially, they started calling in public rallies [for people] not to purchase our newspaper,” says Bozkurt, in an interview with Global Journalist. “Amazingly, at the time our circulation went up because we were one of the few media outlets in Turkey that were still covering the corruption investigation…later they started putting pressure on advertisers. That didn’t work out either because our circulation was quite high.”

After Zaman’s closure, Bozkurt briefly opened his own news agency. A few weeks later, on July 15, 2016, a faction of the military attempted to overthrow Erdogan. The coup was put down in a matter of hours. But in its aftermath, Erdogan unleashed a nationwide purge.

Over 100,000 government workers were fired and 47,000 people were jailed on suspicion of terrorism, according to a tally by Human Rights Watch. An additional 150 journalists and media workers were also jailed, giving Turkey the highest number of jailed journalists in the world. Many others fled the country.

Bozkurt was among those who chose to flee rather than face arrest. Ten days after the failed coup, he left for Sweden. The day after he left, the offices of his fledgling news agency were raided by police. Police later searched the home of Bozkurt’s 79-year-old mother and detained her for a day. Bozkurt’s wife and three children later followed him.

In Sweden, Bozkurt received threats via social media and a Wild West-style ‘wanted photo’ of him was published by pro-Erdogan newspapers and the state-run news agency. The government has brought anti-state charges against 30 of his former Zaman colleagues, seeking as much as three life sentences in jail.

Bozkurt, 47, now writes regular columns for the news site Turkishminute.com and works at the Stockholm Center for Freedom, a rights group focused on Turkey. He spoke with Global Journalist’s Denitsa Tsekova about his last weeks in Turkey and his exile. Below, an edited version of their interview:

Bozkurt: I was based in the capital, Ankara, but our newspaper’s headquarters was in Istanbul. The storming of our newspaper happened in Istanbul, we were watching on TV. We were on the phone talking to our colleagues in Istanbul, trying to find what’s going on, what we can do. The police were coming into our Istanbul’s newsrooms, ransacking the place, and shutting the internet service. It was up to me and my colleagues in the Ankara office to write the stories. We were actually printing the last edition of Zaman from Ankara. I was the one who drew the headline in the English edition and we managed to get out the last free edition. In the Turkish edition, we managed to finish and print the first one, but the second and the third edition couldn’t make it to the printing place. It was interrupted by the police and the government caretakers who took over the company.

GJ: There were protests after the closure of Zaman. What happened?

Bozkurt: It was on the day when the takeover judgment by the court was publicized. We didn’t call our readers to come and protest.

We knew it might be very dangerous because the government uses very harsh measures often rubber bullets, pepper spray and pressurized water against peaceful protesters. We didn’t want to put them on the risk.

Around 400 people showed up and they were beaten and targeted brutally by the police who stormed the building.

GJ: What was the last article you wrote for Today’s Zaman?

Bozkurt: It was about prisons. When I wrote that article I didn’t know the government was taking over the company, it was written a day before.

I talked to many people in the government and some from the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture. Something was very, very off because the government planned to build a lot of prisons in Turkey under the disguise of a modernization plan.

However, when you look at the numbers, it didn’t really match. We didn’t need that many new prisons in Turkey, but the government was making a projection that the prison population would increase.

When the European officials asked the justice ministry on what basis were they making this projection, they did not have a response.

In hindsight, I could understand it was because they were preparing a new mass prosecution in Turkey and they needed more prisons to put these people away. Even the prisons we have now are not enough; people are living in very crowded cells. After the coup, the government even granted amnesty for some 40,000 convicted felons… just to make space for the political prisoners and journalists.

GJ: How did you decide to leave?

Bozkurt: I actually hung around for a while after the failed coup, because I thought eventually things will settle down, and I wasn’t planning to move out of Turkey at all.

[Ten days] after the coup, the government issued an arrest warrant against 42 journalists on a single day. I realized this is going to get worse, and I said it’s time for me to move out of Turkey.

It was a rash decision, I didn’t even know to which country I would go, so I had to go to Germany first and then to Sweden.

My mother was getting old, she has some health issues and I wanted to be there for her. But it wasn’t up to me. Sweden was a stopover for me, I wasn’t planning on staying permanently.

The day after I left Turkey, the police raided my office in Ankara, so it was the right decision. If I was there I would have been detained and dragged to jail.

GJ: Were you getting threats?

Bozkurt:  I was getting threats all the time. If you are a critical and independent journalist, you will get them. That’s the price you pay for it. Sometimes you try to be vigilant, you try to be careful and you just ignore that kind of threats or pressure from the government or pro-government circles.

But after the massive crackdown after the coup attempt, I thought it’s no longer safe for me. I moved out alone, I didn’t even take my family, because I thought they will stay in Turkey and I can hang around abroad and then come back to Turkey. That was my plan.

After a while, the Turkish government started going after the family members of the journalists. Bülent Korucu was a chief editor of a national daily [Yarına Bakıs], which was also shut down by the government, and he was facing an arrest warrant. The police couldn’t find him and they arrested his wife, Hacer Korucu. She stayed in prison for a month on account of her husband. At that moment, I thought my family is no longer safe either, so I decided to extract them out of the country.

GJ: Was your family directly threatened?

Bozkurt: When I moved out of Turkey I kept writing about what’s going on in Turkey. I guess they felt uncomfortable with my writings.

It was part of the intimidation campaign to go after family members, including my mother. She is a 79-year-old, she lives alone but sometimes my sister helps her out. Police raided her home in my hometown of Bandirma in December 2016, searched the house and placed her in detention for a day. She was questioned about me.

Why does she deserve that? They want me to shut up, to be silent even though I feel safe abroad.

GJ: What will happen if you go back to Turkey?

Bozkurt: Of course I will get arrested. They even posted a “wanted” picture of me, and it was run in the pro-government dailies and in the state news agency. It’s like in the old Western movies: there is a picture of me and where I live. I have no prediction when I can go back to Turkey. [/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column width=”1/2″][vc_video link=”https://youtu.be/tOxGaGKy6fo”][/vc_column][vc_column width=”1/2″][vc_column_text]Index on Censorship partner Global Journalist is a website that features global press freedom and international news stories as well as a weekly radio program that airs on KBIA, mid-Missouri’s NPR affiliate, and partner stations in six other states. The website and radio show are produced jointly by professional staff and student journalists at the University of Missouri’s School of Journalism, the oldest school of journalism in the United States. [/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_custom_heading text=”Don’t lose your voice. Stay informed.” use_theme_fonts=”yes”][vc_separator color=”black”][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner width=”1/2″][vc_column_text]Index on Censorship is a nonprofit that campaigns for and defends free expression worldwide. We publish work by censored writers and artists, promote debate, and monitor threats to free speech. We believe that everyone should be free to express themselves without fear of harm or persecution – no matter what their views.

Join our mailing list (or follow us on Twitter or Facebook) and we’ll send you our weekly newsletter about our activities defending free speech. We won’t share your personal information with anyone outside Index.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column_inner][vc_column_inner width=”1/2″][gravityform id=”20″ title=”false” description=”false” ajax=”false”][/vc_column_inner][/vc_row_inner][vc_separator color=”black”][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_basic_grid post_type=”post” max_items=”6″ style=”load-more” items_per_page=”2″ element_width=”12″ grid_id=”vc_gid:1517591299623-14a913d2-eca2-3″ taxonomies=”22142″][/vc_column][/vc_row]

بعد وفاة زميلها ، صحافية روسية تخشى العودة إلى وطنها

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_custom_heading text=””][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner][vc_column_text]

Russian journalist Kseniya Kirillova.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column_inner][/vc_row_inner][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]

هذه المقالة جزء من سلسلة “مشروع المنفى” التي تقوده غلوبال جورناليست، شريكة “اندكس أون سنسرشب”، التي تنشر مقابلات مع صحفيين منفيين من جميع أنحاء العالم.

 

اعتقدت كسينيا كيريلوفا أن إقامتها في الولايات المتحدة ستكون مؤقتة.

عندما غادرت مسقط رأسها في ايكاترينبرغ ، بروسيا في ربيع عام ٢٠١٤ للانتقال إلى سياتل مع زوجها ، وهو مهندس برمجيات أوكراني ، كانت لديها خبرة قليلة في الشؤون الدولية.

لكن كل ذلك تغير مع بدء روسيا في تقديم الدعم العلني للانفصاليين في شرق أوكرانيا ، وفي نهاية المطاف غزت وضمت شبه جزيرة القرم. وقد فوجئت كيريلوفا ، التي كانت تعمل في السابق لدى نوفايا غازيتا ، وهي صحيفة روسية مستقلة معروفة بتحقيقاتها حول الفساد وانتقاد الكرملين، بما حدث. كان لديها العديد من الأصدقاء في أوكرانيا ، وكانت مصممة على بذل كل ما في وسعها لمواجهة ما اعتبرته دعاية روسية لتغذية الحرب.

بدأت الكتابة عن الدعاية الروسية لموقع “نوفي ريجيون”. غالبا ما كان هذا الموقع ينتقد الرئيس فلاديمير بوتين ، وقد تم تأسيسه من قبل صديقها ، الصحفي الروسي الكسندر شيتينين. أسس شيتينين هذا الموقع الأخباري في التسعينيات ، لكنه اضطر إلى ترك الشركة تحت ضغط من الحكومة الروسية في عام ٢٠١٤. ثم أعاد بعد ذلك إطلاق الموقع في أوكرانيا.

لم تكن كيريلوفا على غير دراية بالصعوبات التي يواجها الصحفيون الذين يقومون بتحدي الحكومة الروسية. قُتل ما لا يقل عن ٥٨ صحفياً في روسيا منذ عام ١٩٩٣ ، وفقاً للجنة حماية الصحفيين. ويشمل ذلك العديد من صحفيي نوفايا غازيتا الذين قُتلوا أو ماتوا في ظروف غامضة منذ عام ٢٠٠٠.

كانت كيريلوفا تشعر بالأمان في الولايات المتحدة. ولكن في أغسطس / آب ٢٠١٦ ، عثر على شيتينين ، الذي كان قد وصف بوتين بـ “عدوه الشخصي” ، ميتًا مصابًا برصاصة في رأسه في شقته في كييف. تم العثور على رسالة انتحار بالقرب من جثة شيتينين. لا تعتقد كيريلوفا أن شيتينين قد قتل نفسه ، ولقد فتحت السلطات الأوكرانية تحقيقاً في جريمة القتل.

بعد وقت قصير من وفاة شيتينين ، عثرت كيريلوفا على موقع مؤيد لروسيا على الإنترنت يحتوي على أسماء “متطرفين مناهضين لروسيا”. كان اسمها على القائمة. اذن يبدو أن العودة إلى روسيا ، التي كانت خطرة أصلاً ، قد تكون مميتة لها.

تعيش كيريلوفا ، ٣٣ عاما ، اليوم في أوكلاند ، كاليفورنيا ، وهي تشارك بانتظام في النسخة الروسية من راديو أوروبا الحرة / راديو ليبرتي المدعومة من قبل الولايات المتحدة بالإضافة إلى محطة تي سي إتش الأوكرانية. وتحدثت مع جيون تشوي من غلوبال جورناليست عن وفاة زميلها وجهودها لمواجهة الدعاية في وسائل الإعلام الروسية.

غلوبال جورناليست: كيف أثر الصراع بين روسيا وأوكرانيا عليك؟

كيريلوفا: بدأت كل مشاكلي في روسيا بسبب نشاطي في أمريكا. قبل أن آتي إلى هنا ، عملت لسنوات عديدة … لدى نوفايا غازيتا في فرع الأورال. عشت في مسقط رأسي ايكاترينبرغ. جئت إلى أمريكا عن طريق المصادفة. زوجي ، وهو مواطن من أوكرانيا ، كان لديه عقد عمل مؤقت في الولايات المتحدة. وفي الوقت نفسه ، بدأت الحرب الروسية والأوكرانية في مارس ٢٠١٤.

لقد شكّل ذلك الحدث صدمة حقيقية بالنسبة لي. اعتبرت أنه من واجبي أن أفعل شيئًا ما ، لذا بدأت في تحليل الدعاية الروسية ومخاوف الروس وعقليتهم. كانت الأهمية الأساسية بالنسبة لي هي أن هذه المعلومات قد تساعد في منع الاستفزازات الروسية الجديدة حول العالم.

غلوبال جورناليست: كيف تغيرت الصحافة في روسيا في السنوات الأخيرة؟

كيريلوفا: عندما كنت في روسيا ، كنت أغطي بعض الموضوعات الخطيرة. قبل الحرب ، كانت [وسائل الإعلام] الروسية تدافع عن نظام بوتين ، ولكن ليس بشراسة كما هو الوضع الآن. لم يكن من الصعب التحدث عن الحكومة. كان يمكننا [كان يمكن للمراسلين أن يكتبوا عن] الفساد وأن نقول الحقيقة حول المجالات السياسية والاجتماعية وغيرها. كانت سلطات الحكم المحلي مستقلة عن الحكومة الفيدرالية.

في عام ٢٠١٠ ، تغيرت الحكومة في منطقتي. لقد أنشأوا نظامًا موحّدًا وأضافوا منصبا مثل مراقب المدينة الذي عينته الحكومة الفيدرالية. أصبح من المستحيل تغطية أي مشاكل اجتماعية ، لأن كل المشاكل كان لها علاقة بالمسؤولين الحكوميين. أصبح من المستحيل نشر أي مقالات انتقادية.

غلوبال جورناليست : متى سمعت لأول مرة أن الحكومة الروسية كانت تستهدفك انت وألكسندر؟

كيريلوفا: حذرني صديقي المقرب ألكسندر شيتينين ​​من أن كلينا سوف يتهم بالخيانة. كان ذلك في ربيع عام ٢٠١٥. وكانت السلطات الروسية تلقي تلك التهمة حتى على الأشخاص العاديين الذين لم يكن لديهم أي علاقة مع أسرار الدولة ، بمن فيهم ربات البيوت البسيطات والبائعات. أعلنت المحكمة العليا الروسية [نوفا ريجيون] كموقع متطرف فقط لأنه كانت يعمل من أوكرانيا وكان يعارض العدوان الروسي. وهكذا ، أصبحنا رسميا صحفيين نعمل مع مصدر “متطرف”.

باشرت السلطات الروسية بإجراءات جنائية ضد أصدقائي ، والمعارضين الروس من ايكاترينبرغ ، بما في ذلك بسبب تدوينات بريئة على الشبكات الاجتماعية أدانت الحرب. وهكذا ، فهمنا أن قضية جنائية كانت تنتظرنا بالفعل في روسيا.

غلوبال جورناليست: كيف كان شعورك عندما علمت أن ألكسندر قد مات؟

كيريلوفا: كان ألكساندر قد قرر اتباع نفس الخيار الذي اتبعته أنا – أي دعم أوكرانيا كصحفي روسي. قبل وفاته ، فقد معظم أعماله ، ولم يتمكن من زيارة عائلته وأطفاله البالغين في روسيا. حارب الدعاية الروسية وعملاء النفوذ الروسي في أوكرانيا.

لا أعتقد أنه كان انتحارًا. فلقد توفي بعد شهر من اغتيال صحفي معارض روسي آخر في كييف ، بافيل شيريميت. بعد وفاة ألكسندر الغريبة في كييف ، وجدت مقالاً على موقع رسمي للدعاية الروسية تم إزالته فيما بعد. قالت المقالة إن جميع الصحفيين الروس الذين يدعمون أوكرانيا قد يقتلون. كان اسمي في تلك القائمة.

غلوبال جورناليست: ما هو الجزء الأكثر صعوبة في العيش في المنفى في الولايات المتحدة؟

كيريلوفا: لفترة طويلة ، لم يكن لدي حتى تصريح عمل في الولايات المتحدة. كنت أنتظر اللجوء لمدة عامين ، حتى قبل مقتل ألكسندر. كنت أعمل لمدة عامين كمتطوعة ، دون أي راتب. الآن كل شيء على ما يرام ، فلدي تصريح عمل.

لقد فقدت كل شيء بسبب قراري – لا أقصد قرار المجيء إلى هنا ، ولكن القرار في الانخراط في هذا العمل. لكن لم يكن لدي أي أوهام حول هذا الموضوع.

https://www.indexoncensorship.org/2018/02/colleagues-death-russian-reporter-fears-return-homeland/

[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]

After colleague’s death, Russian reporter fears return to homeland

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_single_image image=”97735″ img_size=”full” add_caption=”yes” alignment=”center”][vc_column_text]This article is part of Index on Censorship partner Global Journalist’s Project Exile series, which has published interviews with exiled journalists from around the world.[/vc_column_text][vc_column_text]Kseniya Kirillova thought her stay in the U.S. would be only temporary.

When she left her hometown of Ekaterinburg, Russia in the spring of 2014 to move to Seattle with her husband, a Ukrainian software engineer, she had little experience in international affairs.

But all that changed as Russia began to openly back separatists in eastern Ukraine, and eventually invaded and annexed the Crimean Peninsula. Kirillova, who had previously worked for Novaya Gazeta, an independent Russian newspaper known for its investigations of corruption and criticism of the Kremlin, was taken aback. She had many friends in Ukraine, and was determined to do all she could to counter what she saw as Russian propaganda that was feeding the war effort.

She began writing about Russian propaganda for the website Novy Region. Often critical of President Vladimir Putin, the site had been founded by a friend, Russian journalist Alexander Shchetinin. Shchetinin had founded the news outlet in the 1990s but was forced to leave the company under pressure from the Russian government in 2014. He later relaunched the site in Ukraine.

Kirillova wasn’t unfamiliar with the difficulties reporters face in challenging the Russian government. At least 58 journalists have been killed in Russia since 1993, according to the Committee to Protect Journalists. That includes several Novaya Gazeta journalists who were killed or died in mysterious circumstances since 2000.

Living in the U.S., was safe. But in August 2016, Shchetinin, who had called Putin his “personal enemy,” was found dead of a gunshot wound to the head in his apartment in Kiev. A suicide note was found near Shchetinin’s body. Kirillova doesn’t believe Shchetinin killed himself, and Ukrainian authorities opened a murder investigation.

Soon after Shchetinin’s death, Kirillova found a pro-Russia site online listing the names of “anti-Russia extremists.” Her name was on the list. A return to Russia, already dangerous, now seemed potentially deadly.

Today Kirillova, 33, lives in Oakland, Calif. and is a contributor to the Russian service of U.S.-backed Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty as well as the Ukrainian broadcaster TCH. She spoke with Global Journalist’s Jiwon Choi about the death of her collaborator and her efforts to counter propaganda in Russian media.

Global Journalist: How has the conflict between Russia and Ukraine affected you?

Kirillova: All my problems in Russia started because of my activity in America. Before I came here, I worked for several years…for Novaya Gazeta in the Urals branch. I lived in my hometown Ekaterinburg. I came to America accidentally. My husband, who is a citizen of Ukraine, he had a temporary work contract in the U.S. At the same time, the Russian and Ukrainian war began [in] March 2014.

It was a real shock for me. I considered it my duty to do something, so I began to analyze Russian propaganda, [their] fears and their mentality. The main importance for me was if this information could prevent new Russian provocations around the world.

GJ: How has journalism in Russia changed in recent years?

Kirillova: When I was in Russia, I sometimes covered some dangerous topics. Before the war, Russian [media] was defending Putin’s regime, but not as aggressively as it is now. It wasn’t so hard to talk about the government. We [reporters could write about] corruption and tell the truth about political, social and other spheres. Local government authorities were independent from the federal.

In 2010, the government changed in my region. They created a united power system and added a position like a city monitor, who was appointed by the federal government. It became impossible to cover any social problems, because any problems have something to do with government officials. It became impossible to publish any critical articles.

GJ: When did you first hear that the Russian government was targeting you and Alexander?

Kirillova: My close friend Alexander Shchetinin warned me that both of us would be charged with state treason. It was in in the spring of 2015. Russian authorities were accusing even ordinary people who didn’t have any access to state secrets, including simple housewives and saleswomen. The Russian Supreme Court recognized [Nova Region] as an extremist site only because it was in Ukraine and was opposed to Russian aggression. Thus, we officially became journalists of an “extremist” resource.

The Russian authorities instituted criminal proceedings against my friends, Russian dissidents from Ekaterinburg, even for innocent posts in social networks condemning the war. Thus, we already understood that a criminal case was waiting for us in Russia.

Russian journalist Alexander Shchetinin, pictured in front of the former headquarters of the KGB in Moscow with a stuffed bear.

Russian journalist Alexander Shchetinin, pictured in front of the former headquarters of the KGB in Moscow with a stuffed bear.

GJ: How did you feel when you learned that Alexander was dead?

Kirillova: Alexander was someone who made the same choice as me – supporting Ukraine as a Russian journalist. Before his death, he lost most of his business, couldn’t visit his family and his adult children in Russia. He fought against Russian propaganda and agents of Russian influence in Ukraine.

I don’t believe that it was a suicide. He died a month after the murder of another Russian opposition journalist in Kiev, Pavel Sheremet. After the strange death of Alexander in Kiev, I found an article on an official Russian propaganda website which was later removed. It said that all Russian journalists who support Ukraine might be killed. My name was on the list.

GJ: What is the most difficult part of living in exile in the United States?

Kirillova: For a long time, I didn’t even have a work permit in the U.S. I was waiting for asylum [for] two years, even before the murder of Alexander. I was working for two years as a volunteer, without any payment. Now everything is fine, I have a work permit.

I lost everything because of my decision–I don’t mean the decision to come here, but the decision to start this work. But I never had illusions about this topic. [/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column width=”1/2″][vc_video link=”https://youtu.be/tOxGaGKy6fo”][/vc_column][vc_column width=”1/2″][vc_column_text]Index on Censorship partner Global Journalist is a website that features global press freedom and international news stories as well as a weekly radio program that airs on KBIA, mid-Missouri’s NPR affiliate, and partner stations in six other states. The website and radio show are produced jointly by professional staff and student journalists at the University of Missouri’s School of Journalism, the oldest school of journalism in the United States. [/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_custom_heading text=”Don’t lose your voice. Stay informed.” use_theme_fonts=”yes”][vc_separator color=”black”][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner width=”1/2″][vc_column_text]Index on Censorship is a nonprofit that campaigns for and defends free expression worldwide. We publish work by censored writers and artists, promote debate, and monitor threats to free speech. We believe that everyone should be free to express themselves without fear of harm or persecution – no matter what their views.

Join our mailing list (or follow us on Twitter or Facebook) and we’ll send you our weekly newsletter about our activities defending free speech. We won’t share your personal information with anyone outside Index.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column_inner][vc_column_inner width=”1/2″][gravityform id=”20″ title=”false” description=”false” ajax=”false”][/vc_column_inner][/vc_row_inner][vc_separator color=”black”][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_basic_grid post_type=”post” max_items=”6″ style=”load-more” items_per_page=”2″ element_width=”12″ grid_id=”vc_gid:1516813685289-3cea7194-74a5-4″ taxonomies=”22142″][/vc_column][/vc_row]

SUPPORT INDEX'S WORK