Nominations open for 2018 Index on Censorship Freedom of Expression Awards Fellowship

This press release is also available in FrenchRussian, Mandarin, Turkish, Arabic and Spanish

Index on Censorship Freedom of Expression Awards Fellowship 2018

Index on Censorship Freedom of Expression Awards Fellowship 2018

Index on Censorship opens nominations for the 2018 Freedom of Expression Awards Fellowship

  • Awards Fellowship honours journalists, campaigners, digital activists and artists fighting censorship globally
  • Fellows receive a year-long package of assistance
  • Nominate at indexoncensorship.org/nominations
  • Nominations are open from 5 September to 8 October 2017
  • #IndexAwards2018

Nominations for the Index on Censorship Freedom of Expression Awards Fellowship are open. Now in their 18th year, the awards honour some of the world’s most remarkable free expression heroes.

Previous winners include high profile Russian campaigner Ildar Dadin who was freed from jail whilst nominated, anonymous Chinese digital activists GreatFire who have since secured significant additional funding, and musician and campaigner Smockey who was supported to rebuild his studio in Burkina Faso after it was burnt down in a suspected arson attack.

The Awards Fellowship seeks to support activists at all levels and spans the world with other past winners including Syrian cartoonist Ali Farzat, Pakistani education campaigner Malala Yousafzai, Saudi investigative journalist Safa Al Ahmad and South African LGBTI photographer Zanele Muholi.

Index invites the general public, civil society organisations, non-profit groups and media organisations to nominate anyone (individuals or organisations) who they believe should be  celebrated and supported in their work tackling censorship worldwide.

We are offering four fellowships, one in each of the four categories:

  • Arts for artists (any form) and arts producers whose work challenges repression and injustice and celebrates artistic free expression.
  • Campaigning for activists and campaigners who have had a marked impact in fighting censorship and promoting freedom of expression.
  • Digital Activism for innovative uses of technology to circumvent censorship and enable free and independent exchange of information.
  • Journalism for courageous, high impact and determined journalism (any form) that exposes censorship and threats to free expression.

As awards fellows, all winners receive a year of direct support including advanced-level capacity building, mentoring and strategic support. The 12 months commence with a week-long residential in London (April 2018). We seek, over the course of the year, to significantly enhance the impact and sustainability of awards fellows’ work.

Jodie Ginsberg, CEO of Index, said: “The Freedom of Expression Awards Fellowship not only showcases — but also strengthens — groups and individuals doing brave and brilliant work to enhance freedom of expression around the world. Awards fellows often have to overcome immense obstacles and face great danger just for the right to express themselves. This is our chance to celebrate them.”

“Use your voice by nominating a free expression champion – make sure their voice is heard.”

The 2018 awards shortlist will be announced in late January. The fellows will be selected by a high profile panel of judges and announced in London at a gala ceremony in April 2018.

For more information on the awards and fellowship, please contact [email protected] or call +44 (0)207 963 7262.

This press release is also available in Russian, Mandarin, Turkish, Arabic and Spanish

About the Freedom of Expression Awards Fellowship

Winners of the 2018 Freedom of Expression Awards Fellowship receive 12 months of capacity building, coaching and strategic support. Through the fellowships, Index seeks to maximise the impact and sustainability of voices at the forefront of pushing back censorship worldwide. More information

About Index on Censorship

Index on Censorship is a London-based non-profit organisation that publishes work by censored writers and artists and campaigns against censorship worldwide. Since its founding in 1972, Index on Censorship has published some of the greatest names in literature in its award-winning quarterly magazine, including Samuel Beckett, Nadine Gordimer, Mario Vargas Llosa, Arthur Miller and Kurt Vonnegut. It also has published some of the world’s best campaigning writers from Vaclav Havel to Elif Shafik. 

Former Israeli general moves to silence independent journalist David Sheen

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]

David Sheen at Israel’s State Archives in Jerusalem (Credit: Rotem Malenky)

David Sheen at Israel’s State Archives in Jerusalem (Credit: Rotem Malenky)

Israeli-Canadian journalist David Sheen, a former editor at Haaretz who regularly reports on racism against Africans within Israel, is the subject of a defamation lawsuit by former Israeli general Israel Ziv demanding $200,000. The case falls under what is known as a strategic lawsuit against public participation – or SLAPP.

“Ziv claims that I have defamed him by reporting on his activities and by referring to him in my tweets as an ‘arch-racist’, a ‘racist ringleader’, and a ‘war crimes whitewasher,’” Sheen said in an email to Index. “I contend that these are my opinions and that they are based on reported facts.”

In January 2017, Sheen wrote an article for the Electronic Intifada, an independent news website focusing on Palestine, entitled Netanyahu Openly Boasts of Israel’s War on Africans, in which he refers to Ziv as one of ten Israeli “ringleaders in Israel’s war on Africans”.

The mentions of Ziv in Sheen’s article refer to an investigation by Israel’s Channel 2 TV in 2016 that made public conversations between Ziv, now the owner of security consultancy company Global CST, and his associates during which they discussed a campaign with the objective to “whitewash the reputation” of the “cruel president” of South Sudan, Salva Kiir, “and to fortify his regime”. This followed a report by the United Nations that Kiir had allowed soldiers under his command to commit “a multitude of horrendous human rights violations,” including raping women and children en masse “in lieu of wages”. Ideas floated during Ziv’s meeting include that Kiir could blame these crimes on indigenous African tribal culture or that he could make a speech at the UN flanked by the victims.

Channel 2 TV and other news organisations that reported on this story are not facing legal action from Ziv, but Sheen, an independent journalist, is.

“While large news organisations employ teams of lawyers who can fend off SLAPP suits and legal harassment, independent journalists such as myself don’t, so we present a tempting target,” Sheen told Index. “But more than this: the mainstream media reports of Ziv’s efforts to aid the president of South Sudan were in the Hebrew language, which is only spoken by 0.1% of the world population.”

Sheen’s report was in English, the third most-spoken language in the world. “So even though my report was published by a small independent outlet, it has the potential of being read by many more people, and that is something that Ziv clearly wishes to prevent,” he said.

Sheen added that, in general terms, reporting on Israeli mistreatment of Africans is sometimes met with more resistance than reporting on Israeli mistreatment of Palestinians. “There is already a well-established ‘both sides’ narrative that can be utilised to try to explain away the latter. Israel’s defenders can say that Jews and Arabs have been battling for a hundred years, so Israeli mistreatment of Palestinians is just another round of tit for tat fighting.” he said. “They can’t use this narrative in regards to Israeli mistreatment of Africans because there is no recent – or ancient – history of conflict between Jews and African peoples. Unable to neuter criticism of the maltreatment of Africans, Israel’s defenders hope to silence reports about it.”

Sheen added that the libel lawsuit against him sends a clear warning to his fellow journalists that “in Israel, free speech is far from free, and powerful people can make critical speech extremely expensive for you, so don’t do it”.

“The case against David Sheen appears to be politically motivated,” said Melody Patry, head of advocacy at Index on Censorship. “No journalist should be prosecuted for exercising their freedom of speech.”

In recent years a number of lawsuits, many successful, have been made against journalists by officials in Israel, including a $464,000 2016 libel case against reporter Sharon Shpurer for a Facebook post disparaging an Israeli developer who is a convicted human trafficker. In July 2017, a journalist who claimed Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was kicked out of his car by his wife was ordered to pay $32,500 in damages to the couple for libel.

“As it is, most Israeli media outlets serve as semi-stenographers of the Israeli army, repeating its press releases as though they were objective fact,” Sheen told Index. “The additional danger of crippling legal fees and fines will further disincentivise telling truth to power and leave Israeli society with increasingly impoverished fourth and fifth estates. Obviously, those who will suffer most as a result will be the country’s oppressed populations.”

In August 2017, the Israeli government announced proposals to ban Al Jazeera from operating in the country, echoing similar moves by Saudi Arabia and others who demanded that Qatar shutter the network and other media outlets as part of a list of demands to end a diplomatic crisis. The Israeli Government Press Office seemed intent on revoking the press credentials of Al Jazeera reporter Elias Karram but decided against this on 30 August. However, this was only after Karram provided a statement saying he does not support terrorism. The head of the GPO has said the body will “keep track of the network’s reports in Israel, in Arabic and in English, and will not hesitate to reach the necessary conclusions after consulting with legal and security officials”.

“Without question, freedom of the press is steadily decreasing in Israel,” Sheen told Index. “Sadly, many Israeli citizens seem to support it: in a 2015 article I wrote for Alternet, I noted that nearly half of Israelis believe that harsh public criticism of the government should be against the law.”

During a pre-trial session on 18 September, the dates for the case against Sheen will be set.

Supporters of Sheen have set up a petition to support the journalist.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_basic_grid post_type=”post” max_items=”4″ element_width=”6″ grid_id=”vc_gid:1504615911945-5d3d3e69-6e05-2″ taxonomies=”180, 449″][/vc_column][/vc_row]

2018年Index On Censorship言论自由奖正式公开提名

2018年Index On Censorship言论自由奖正式公开提名

Index on Fellowship为了奖励与言论自由审查制度搏斗多年的记者,电子活动家以及艺术家设立了此奖项。

2018年Index On Censorship言论自由奖正式公开提名。此奖项在这十八年里已奖励了许多令人钦佩的言论自由活动家。

此奖项的得奖者包括提名后被释放的俄罗斯活动家Ildar Dadin,中国大陆电子活动组织Great Fire (此组织获奖以后也收到了附加的经济支援)以及音乐家兼活动家Smockey(他得奖以后 获得了重建在布基纳法索被烧毁的录制室之资金)。

Index on Censorship为了公认以及奖励来自世界各地,来自各个社会阶层的活动家而设立此言论自由奖项。此奖项的获奖者包括来自叙利亚的漫画家Ali Farzat, 来自巴基斯坦的教育活动者Malala Yousafzai, 来自萨特阿拉伯的调差记者Safa Al Ahmad以及来自南非的同志摄影师Zanele Muholi。

Index on Censorship 在此邀请大众人士,公民社会组织, 非盈利组织以及媒体集团提名您们认为应被大众公认的反审查制度之活动家。

此言论自由奖再分为四种奖项:

  • 艺术奖项:颁发予通类艺术作品歌颂艺术表达自由以及抗议种种镇压性和不公平的制度之艺术家。
  • 动奖项颁发极抗议审查和提倡言论自由的活动者。
  • 子/网动奖项颁发予能够巧妙应用各种有创意的电脑技术和电子媒体以避免资料审查及促使不受限制的讯息交流之网络活动者。
  • 闻业奖项颁发予在新闻界里勇于揭发资讯审查以及威胁言论自由的举动和政策。

获奖者将会收到长达一年的特供高等训练以及24小时的紧急援助。 在这一年里,获奖者也有机会到伦敦接受长达一个星期的培训。Index on Censorship 希望能够通过这一年的训练增进获奖者的言论自由活动之影响力。

审查指数总裁Jodie Ginsberg 表示:“言论自由此奖项不但能够展示以言论自由艺术作品,也能够鼓舞了争取言自由不懈斗的人士和组织大的人士在争取言论自由的路途中经历种种障碍及生命危险。 因此,我希望大家能够借此机会提名您们认为应在争取言论自由方面受认可的人士或组织。此奖项给予我们一个公认这些令人钦佩的言论自由家之机会。”

“敬请提名您们认为应受认可的言论自由活动价以让大众人士公认他们为了搏斗言论审查制度而付出的贡献和代价。”

此言自由组办当局将在一月尾公布最单,而一支由著名人士构成的评判小组将会从候选名单中筛选得奖者。 组办当局也将于2017年4月在伦敦举办一场盛会,并在当天公布得奖者名单。

如有任何于此奖的疑问, 请把电子邮件发给[email protected] , 或者拨打+44 (0)207 963 7262询问

SUPPORT INDEX'S WORK