An exceptional editor: a tribute to Judith Vidal-Hall who reinvented Index magazine after the end of the Cold War

Judith Vidal-Hall was an original. Irrepressible, mischievous, with a delight in challenging convention, she remained wholly dedicated to the causes she championed as a campaigning editor and journalist.

She was a pioneer, bringing the voices of the Global South to a wider audience at the start of her career in journalism for the Guardian’s Third World Review and for the magazine South. It was an interest informed by a passionate fascination with the culture and the politics of countries rarely covered in the mainstream press - and by her extensive travel. She was an independent thinker, guided by her own integrity, curiosity and irreverent wit.

As editor of Index on Censorship from 1993 to 2006, she continued her commitment to introducing a diverse range of writers and artists to a western audience, as well as attracting leading international names. This was a heyday for Index, which was founded during the Cold War and had played a significant role exposing censorship and championing writers from eastern Europe. Alongside the editor-in-chief, Ursula Owen, Judith successfully reinvented the magazine after the fall of communism. “Censorship does not end,” Judith once wrote. “It merely changes its guise and shifts location.” Through Judith and Ursula’s vision and energy, Index became essential reading, offering an alternative view on world affairs through the lens of censorship. They also attracted some of the leading names in journalism to support the magazine - Michael Grade was appointed chair of the board. Judith was early to cover the trends that would transform the landscape for freedom of expression, including the impact of technology, and edited an issue on privacy in 2000. She focused on culture as much as politics and was particularly proud of one of Index’s finest issues dedicated to photography, Underexposed, published in 1999.

She was a striking woman, who always wore eye-catching jewellery that she’d bought on her travels. She had the resonant voice and dramatic presence of an actor and dominated any occasion with the energy of her charisma and commanding, extrovert personality. It was impossible not to be captivated by her.

Judith was born in Leicester in 1938. Her mother Dorothea and father John Alan Bunting had five children. Her father was a bank manager who had served as an officer in the navy during the war on the Atlantic convoys. Judith read history at St Anne’s College, Oxford, where she met her husband Tim Vidal-Hall. They had two daughters, Charlotte and Hatty, and separated in the late 1980s.

She lived in Bangladesh with her family in the 1970s, when her husband Tim was advising the government on industrial relations. It was a life-changing experience for Judith, who became involved in a network supporting health in local villages. Her daughter Hatty recalls that it was a period in Judith’s life that “set a fire alight in her and was the start of things”. The family had an adventurous journey home, driving back through India, Afghanistan, Iran and Turkey.

She began working in journalism after meeting the Pakistani journalist Altaf Gauhar who launched the Third World Review with the Guardian and South magazine. Judith became an intrepid traveller. Her friend the writer Penelope Farmer remembers Judith’s stories of visiting Afghanistan after the Russian invasion. “She sat on Russian tanks, sunbathing. She said, ‘I learned to know the difference between the kind of attack where you had to get into the tank very quickly and shelter there, or when you had to get off it equally quickly. The noises were different.’” Judith also recalled meeting Saddam Hussein’s foreign minister in Baghdad during the Iran-Iraq war while the city was being bombed.

After leaving Index, Judith continued working as an editor and remained engaged with freedom of expression. She was an active member of the advisory board of Eurozine, a network of European cultural journals and an online magazine, and edited the publication of her old Oxford college, St Anne’s, right up until the last month of her life. She also continued travelling into her 80s. She was diagnosed with terminal cancer in the summer.

Judith was, notably, the lead plaintiff in a legal action against Google for collecting private information without knowledge or consent - Vidal-Hall v Google Inc. The Court of Appeal’s decision in 2015 that damages can be awarded under the Data Protection Act 1998 for distress and anxiety, even if no financial loss is suffered, has been hailed as a landmark ruling. In addition to being a significant victory, Judith’s name will forever be linked with Google, as well as Index if you look her up online. It’s something that she would, I suspect, in her spirit of mischief, have found amusing.

Judith Vidal-Hall, born 24 February 1938 and died on 23 October 2025. She is survived by her daughters Charlotte and Hatty, her grandchildren Hannah, Ruth, Kate and James, her step-grandchildren Billy and Nancy, and her sons-in-law Adam and Colin.

Crown Confidential: Access to Historical Records about the Royal Family

]Are the British Royal Family the real enemies of history? Over the decades they have actively suppressed uncomfortable narratives about themselves. Hundreds of files in the national and royal archives remain inaccessible to the general public, files that many would argue are of public interest. The result? Holes in our country's history.

These are some of the conclusions from the team at the magazine Index on Censorship, who carried out an investigation into royal historical censorship for their Winter issue. As part of the launch of the magazine, a panel of speakers will discuss the findings alongside their experiences of trying to access historical archives. This will be a lively discussion and one with heightened importance following the death of Queen Elizabeth II in September and ahead of the coronation of Charles III in the spring.

Speaking on the panel will be:

The event will be chaired by Jemimah Steinfeld, editor-in-chief at Index on Censorship.

When: Wednesday , 5:30pm - 7:00pm

Where: Woburn Suite, G22/26, Ground Floor, Senate House, Malet Street, London WC1E 7HU

Tickets: Free, advance booking essential

Banned by Beijing: Artistic Freedom and CCP Censorship in Europe

“How to protect the freedom of the individual, including that of the artist, when the limits of government power are ever expanding, is a question for the whole world.”

Chiang Seeta, exiled Chinese artist living in France

Despite the strong focus on artistic freedom in many European countries, artists based in Europe are reporting attempts at censorship by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). The CCP has deployed extensive diplomatic pressure in an attempt to censor artwork and exhibitions. We have also identified endemic self-censorship within dissident artist communities, alongside extensive ties between Chinese companies and European museums and galleries. To investigate the current state of artistic freedom in Europe, and whether and how the CCP attempts to undermine it, Index on Censorship conducted interviews with more than 40 artists, curators, academics and experts from 10 European countries.

Join Index on Censorship as we launch our latest report titled Whom to Serve?: How the CCP censors art in Europe. We will discuss the challenges faced by artistic communities in Europe. Is art a tool for dissidents to rally around and critique authoritarianism or a soft power tool for the CCP to control the narrative? What challenges do artists based in Europe face? How can local institutions and organisations support dissident art? And what do these attempts at censorship mean for artistic freedoms in Europe more broadly?

MEET THE SPEAKERS

  • Lumli Lumlong - Hong Kong painter duo living in exile in London
  • Michaela Šilpochová - curator at the DOX Center for Contemporary Art in Prague
  • Jens Galschiøt - International artist and sculptor
  • Iverson NG - Experienced Hong Kong curator and policy advocate
  • Dr Janet Marstine - Honorary Fellow, Research Centre for Museums and Galleries, University of Leicester UK
  • Chair: Nik Williams - Policy and Campaigns Officer, Index on Censorship

When: Thursday 1  December 2022, 5.30-7pm

Where: Online

Tickets: Free, advance booking essential

Keep up focus on rights in Qatar argue Index panel ahead of World Cup

“If there is ever an opportunity to try and pretend a country is a nice country, it’s when everyone is diverted by someone kicking a football,” said Ruth Smeeth, CEO of Index on Censorship. Smeeth was introducing a panel discussion entitled “Qatar 2022: When Football and Free Speech Collide”. Hosted in collaboration with Liverpool John Moores University, the event marked the launch of the Autumn 2022 edition of the Index on Censorship magazine, which looks at the role of football in extending or crushing rights ahead of the Qatar World Cup.

Index on Censorship Editor-in-Chief Jemimah Steinfeld was joined by David Randles, the BA Sports Journalism programme leader at Liverpool John Moores University, who has spent much of his career on sports desks and in press boxes. She was also joined by Connor Dunn, a public relations account manager who deals with big names from the football world, including Liverpool footballer Trent Alexander-Arnold, and was formerly a journalist at Reach PLC.

The issue of whether the FIFA World Cup 2022 being held in Qatar will be a force of change for good was prominent. Dunn was unsure whether there would be any long-term change in the country but felt there will in the short term, saying that “Qatar will want to show the world they are the best country on earth. They’ll be lax with those sort of rules people in the West will be used to [the human rights violations], as there will be potential for stories to be blown up”.

Therein lies a danger, as Steinfeld pointed out. Reeling off a series of examples, she said: “All of the editorials said that while France won the 2018 World Cup Putin was the real winner. The world forgot about the invasion about Crimea.” The fear therefore is that Qatar will relax their attacks on human rights during the tournament, court international leaders, put on a great show and as a result people will walk away with a much better impression of the country than they really should.

Despite attempts to appear more moderate, Randles said that he thinks most minorities would not visit the country due to safety issues. He said: “Would you go to support your team in a regime which doesn’t support you? I don’t think so. If you don’t feel safe, why would you go?” He also pointed out the fact that in Qatar’s neighbouring country Saudi Arabia (whose Sovereign Fund bought Newcastle FC last year), women still cannot attend football games.

Naturally discussion came round to the issue of migrant workers, who have died in huge numbers during the building of infrastructure for Qatar. Sadly the exact numbers are hard to come by, a nature of how tightly information is controlled in the country.

Dunn though highlighted one potential positive that has emerged from the heightened awareness of awful working conditions in Qatar. With claims of potential slave labour being used due to Qatar’s punitive ‘Kafala’ system (which has since been reformed on the back of World Cup coverage), there are hopes for reparations in the future. Dunn said: “There are calls to give the same amount of money the World Cup winner will win, which is about 440 million dollars, to make reparations and give that to underpaid migrant workers and families of those who have died. It's not a big chunk of the predicted profits from the tournament but goes some way to changing things.”

On other positives that could come out of Qatar, all the panel agreed that football still has a unique way to be transformative. Steinfeld cited Permi Jhooti’s story from the new magazine which inspired the film Bend it Like Beckham, an interview with the head of the Afghan Women’s football team and the England Lionesses winning the recent European Championships for the nation's first major trophy in 56 years.

And of course footballers, with their millions of fans, are often more listened to than politicians and could use their platform when in the country to raise rights issues. While they accepted that footballers shouldn't be compelled to speak up, the event was full of examples of those who have - like Marcus Rushford and his campaign for free school meals - and in so doing have brought about important and far-reaching societal change.

SUPPORT INDEX'S WORK