Ukraine: Press freedom violations August 2019

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]

Index on Censorship’s Monitoring and Advocating for Media Freedom project tracks press freedom violations in five countries: Azerbaijan, Belarus, Russia, Turkey and Ukraine. Learn more.

[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner][vc_custom_heading text=”10 Incidents” use_theme_fonts=”yes”][/vc_column_inner][/vc_row_inner][vc_column_text]

TV crew assaulted while reporting on illegal logging in Kharkiv region

28 August 2018 — Unknown individuals attacked a 112-Ukraine TV crew, which was reporting on illegal logging and theft of wood in the village Zolochiv, in the Kharkiv region, 112-Ukraine TV channel reported.

A group of men blocked the journalists’ car and struck its wheels, threatening the journalists with physical violence. A TV reporter called the police, who arrived, but did not intervene. Journalist Oleg Reshetnyak went on the air, described the situation, but the assaulters noticed this and took the camera during the live broadcast.

Reshetnyak was beaten during the assault. An ambulance was called to him.

UPDATE: 29 August 2019 — Police detained 49 individuals suspected of assaulting a television crew, Kharkiv region police reported.

“A conflict between security guards and journalists arose during the shooting of the video. Security guards blocked the car, tried to seize the camcorder and injured a journalist,” the Kharkiv region police press service reported. 

One of the most active individuals is suspected of “obstruction of legitimate professional activity of journalists.” Two more individuals have been detained on suspicion of “threatening or abusing a journalist.”

According to police, private guards working for the logging company used violence, blocked the TV crew’s car, tried to seize the camcorder and injured the journalist. The journalist received multiple injuries to their back and kidneys, as well as bruises on their face. 

Link(s)

https://hk.npu.gov.ua/news/Inshi-podiji/na-xarkivshhini-za-faktom-napadu-na-znimalnu-grupu-odnogo-z-telekanaliv-vidkrito-kriminalne-provadzhennya-onovleno-dodano-vIdeo/

https://112.ua/avarii-chp/na-semochnuyu-gruppu-telekanala-112-ukraina-napali-v-pryamom-efire-505043.html

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=79BlmmSXg1Q

https://detector.media/community/article/170254/2019-08-29-na-kharkivshchini-zatrimali-49-imovirnikh-uchasnikiv-napadu-na-znimalnu-grupu-kanalu-112-ukraina/

https://detector.media/community/article/170289/2019-08-29-u-spravi-pro-napad-na-zhurnalistiv-112-ukraina-ogolosheno-tri-pidozri-zatrimani-dvoe-osib-politsiya/

Categories: Blocked Access, Physical Assault/Injury, Attack to Property, Intimidation

Source of violation: Known private individual(s)

TV correspondent harassed at nationalist rally

24 August 2019 — Nash/Maxi TV journalist Bogdan Karabyniosh was harassed on-air by unknown individuals at a nationalist march in Kyiv, Detector Media reported. 

During a live broadcast, participants in the march people called the channel pro-Russian, shouted the name of the owner of the channel, Volodymyr Murayev, and Vladimir Putin. Afterwards, the unknown individuals called on the journalist to leave and not interfere with the rally. The journalist considered such actions as obstruction of his journalistic activity.   

Link(s): https://detector.media/community/article/170148/2019-08-24-telekanalu-muraeva-zavazhali-robiti-vklyuchennya-z-marshu-zakhisnikiv-video/

https://youtu.be/illqB0zX_Ck

Categories: Blocked Access

Source of violation: Unknown

Chief of Staff sues investigative journalists

20 August 2019 — Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy’s Chief of Staff Andriy Bohdan filed the lawsuit in the Shevchenko District Court of Kyiv against three journalists from Schemes, an investigative program that’s a joint production of Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty and public broadcaster UA:Pershyi. The three journalists are Nataliya Sedletska, Valeria Yegoshina, and Maksym Savchuk, Kyivpost reported.

The details of the lawsuit are currently unavailable, so it is unclear which of Schemes’ reports about the presidential aide Bohdan found defamatory.

“At this point, we have not received the text of Bohdan’s lawsuit. Therefore, we cannot comment on it,” the editorial board of Schemes wrote on Twitter on Aug. 21. “We are confident that the information we publish is reliable and are ready for the trial.”

Bohdan is a former lawyer whose most famous client was oligarch Ihor Kolomoisky. After Zelenskiy’s victory in the presidential election, Bohdan was appointed his chief of staff, heightening concerns over Kolomoisky’s suspected influence on the new president.

Schemes did several investigations into Bohdan. One of them revealed his multiple trips to Tel Aviv, where Kolomoisky resided at the time, while the lawyer was de facto running Zelensky’s election campaign. The show also reported on his secret meeting with the then-head of the constitutional court.

In an interview with Ukrayinska Pravda published on April 25, Bohdan said he was preparing to sue Schemes’ journalists for spreading false information that he had taken 11 flights to Russia, six of which were through Belarus. However, the journalists never reported that. In their investigation, they said Bohdan had made three trips to Russia since 2014 and crossed the Belarusian border 11 times “in an unknown direction during 2018-2019.”

Link(s)

https://www.kyivpost.com/ukraine-politics/chief-of-staff-bohdan-sues-investigative-journalists.html

https://www.radiosvoboda.org/a/news-schemes-bohdan-pozov/30123181.html

https://twitter.com/cxemu/status/1164483913227616256

https://www.pravda.com.ua/rus/articles/2019/04/25/7213591/

Categories: Subpoena / Court Order/ Lawsuits

Source of violation: Government/State Agency/Public official(s)/Political party

Drunk man assaults local TV crew

16 August 2019 — A drunk patron of a shop assaulted members of a TV crew from a regional TV station in Mariupol, Mariupol News reported. The name of the TV channel and the names of journalists were not disclosed.

The individual hit the cameraman and damaged a video camera, the local police press service reported. Journalists filed a complaint to the police. The officers found the offender, who turned out to be a 44-year-old resident of Mariupol. 

The incident was investigated as an “obstruction of the legitimate professional activities of journalists”, which is punishable with up to three years in prison.

Link(s): http://mariupolnews.com.ua/news/view/v-mariupole-pyanyj-muzhchina-napal-na-zhurnalistov

https://imi.org.ua/news/u-mariupoli-napaly-na-zhurnalistiv/

Categories: Physical Assault/Injury, Attack to Property

Source of violation: Known private individual(s)

MP calls journalist “a stupid sheep”

18 August 2019 — Maxim Buzhansky, a member of the Ukrainian parliament, who belongs to president Volodymyr Zelensky’s political party, called Olga Dukhnich, a journalist working for  Novoe Vremya (New Time) “a stupid sheep”, Ukrayinska Pravda reported. 

“Another stupid sheep who is a journalist for the odious media Novoe Vremya said in an interview with a representative of Servant of the People political party that I was nostalgic for the USSR and president Yanukovych’s times. I understand that some colleagues are too restrained to call things by their names, so I will help them. A stupid sheep from the odious media,” Buzhanskiy posted on his Telegram public channel. 

In response, Dukhnich posted on Facebook that “to answer to Mr. Buzhansky is like trying to figure out a relationship with a pigeon that shit on your coat sleeve.” The journalist called on the  politician to apologise to Novoe Vremya, which is a weekly magazine.

In an interview with the leader of Servant of the People, Dmytro Razumkov, Dukhnich said that Buzhanskiy was “nostalgic for the USSR and Viktor Yanukovych’s time.” Razumkov, for his part, said the MPs should be judged for the current and future acts.

In July 2019, parliamentary elections were held. Servant of the People Zelensky’s party gained more than 43 percent of the vote.

Link(s): https://www.pravda.com.ua/news/2019/08/19/7223857/

https://t.me/MaxBuzhanskiy/1196

https://www.facebook.com/olga.dukhnich/posts/10157376817497487

https://nv.ua/ukr/ukraine/politics/zeleniy-spiker-dmitro-razumkov-v-interv-yu-nv-nazivaye-svoyu-maybutnyu-zarplatu-i-kazhe-na-kogo-perepisav-biznes-50037830.html

Categories: Online Defamation/Discredit/Harassment/Verbal Abuse

Source of violation: Government/State Agency/Public official(s)/Political party

Court leaves journalist under house arrest

15 August 2019 — The Korolyovsky District Court of Zhytomyr ruled that journalist and blogger Vasyl Muravitsky should remain under house arrest until 12 October 2019, Ukrinform news agency reported.

Prosecutor Vadym Levchenko filed a motion to change Muravitsky’s pre-trial detention from 24-hour house arrest to remand in custody. According to the prosecutor, there were risks that Muravitsky may hide or commit similar crimes by “writing publications on anti-Ukrainian topics.”

The journalist’s lawyer, Svitlana Novitska, insisted on changing the measure of restraint on personal commitment or bail, instead of house arrest.

At a court hearing the prosecutor read out Muravitsky’s correspondence with other individuals, in which publications, various Ukrainian politicians, the organisation of a press conference and fees were mentioned. In addition, the prosecutor provided a disk with screenshots of Muravitsky’s correspondence on Facebook, Telegram, Skype, as well as the e-mails.

The lawyer noted that such evidence is clearly inadmissible and is an interference with the private correspondence of her client. The prosecutor replied that the investigating judge allowed him to examine the journalist’s correspondence. The court took into consideration the evidence provided by the prosecution, Ukrinform reported.

On 2 August 2017, Muravitsky was arrested on suspicion of treason and undermining the territorial integrity of Ukraine because he worked for Russian news agencies. Until June 27 2018, the journalist was in custody, after which the court changed the preventive measure to house arrest. 

On 6 August 2018, after the court hearing in Zhytomyr, activists from neo-Nazi C14 group splashed Muravitsky with the dye brilliant green as he left the building. (Known as ‘zelenka’, this dye was widely used as an antiseptic during the Soviet period but is now increasingly used in attacks against dissidents and political opponents in Russia and Ukraine, where it is still readily available. It is extremely difficult to wash off the skin, and though not as corrosive as most acids, it can cause chemical burns.)

Link(s): https://www.ukrinform.ua/rubric-society/2760359-pidozruvanomu-u-derzzradi-zurnalistu-prodovzili-domasnij-arest.html

https://imi.org.ua/news/muravyts-komu-prodovzhyly-domashniy-aresht/

Categories: Arrest/Detention/Interrogation, Criminal Charges/Fines/Sentences

Source of violation: Government/State Agency/Public official(s)/Political party

Man harasses TV crew in Odessa

8 August 2019 — An unidentified person interfered with and harassed a Dumskaya TV crew in a casino, Dumskaya.net reported. 

The individual began to threaten the news crew when they learned that a live broadcast was in progress. “If I see myself on the TV screen, you will have a lot of trouble,” the man said to a female journalist who wanted to talk about possible gambling legislation.

The individual forcibly took the camera from the cameraman. The crew’s equipment was damaged as a result of the incident. 

The journalists filed a complaint with the police. 

Link(s): https://dumskaya.net/news/v-odesskom-lotomarkete-napali-na-semochnuyu-grup-101738/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-T-nN_4XWRM

https://imi.org.ua/news/v-odesi-nevidomyy-pereshkodzhav-zhurnalistam-dums-koi-tb-znimaty-v-ihrovomu-klubi/

Categories: Physical Assault/Injury, Attack to Property, Intimidation

Source of violation: Unknown

MP called to attack pro-Russian TV channels with anti-tank missile

12 August 2019 — Appearing on Pryamiy TV, People’s Front MP Serhiy Vysotsky said pro-Russian television channels should be blown up with an anti-tank missile, Strana.ua reported. 

“These channels that we are talking about, they work against Ukraine — in favor of the enemy, all the journalists who work there — they are combatants of the Russian Federation. And what should be done with them is to blow them up with an anti-tank guided missile, that is, to close them,” Vysotsky said during a talk show.

The head of the National Union of Journalists, Serhiy Tomilenko, commented that the deputy’s appeal was an incitement to hostility which is criminalised in Ukraine. 

“With anxiety I note the escalation of pressure on the TV channel. I hope that the new government will find the strength to preserve freedom of expression, to stop the pressure and to ensure the right of journalists to the profession,” the Channel 112 Ukraine CEO Yehor Benkendorf said.

On July 13 2019, the main office of TV Channel 112 Ukraine was attacked with a rocket-propelled grenade in Kyiv. The police still haven’t found the offenders.

During the parliamentary elections of 2019, Vysotsky ran for European Solidarity political party of the ex-president Poroshenko, but was not elected.

Link(s): http://nsju.org/index.php/article/8161

https://ukranews.com/news/647865-vysotskij-sergej-newsone-i-112-predlagaet-podorvat

https://strana.ua/news/216714-soratnik-poroshenko-nardep-serhej-vysotskij-zajavil-chto-ukrainskie-telekanaly-stoit-vzorvat.html

Categories: Intimidation

Source of violation: Government/State Agency/Public official(s)/Political party

Court rules against independent TV channel

6 August 2019 — The commercial court of Kyiv granted far right group C14’s claim against Hromadske TV, Hromadske reported. 

C14 filed a lawsuit against Hromadske TV “on the protection of honour, dignity and business reputation” in July 2018. One of the documents in the statement of claim featured a copy of a tweet posted to the Twitter of the media organization’s English-language service Hromadske International, which describes C14 as a “neo-Nazi group”. The tweet was posted on May 4 2018, when representatives of C14 captured and forcefully took Brazilian militant Rafael Lusvarghi to Ukraine’s Security Service.

The court noted that the information circulated by Hromadske in May 2018 “harms the reputation” of C14 and ordered Hromadske to refute the information and pay 3,500UAH ($136) in court fees to C14.

Olena Tchaikovska, the attorney for Hromadske TV, called the decision “incorrect and illegal.” “It introduces an egregious tendency that suppresses freedom of speech. We will appeal it,”  she said.

“We are surprised by this decision. Not only does it contradict the judicial logic, but is also a dangerous precedent for other media and for freedom of speech in general,” editor-in-chief of Hromadske Angelina Karyakina said of the decision.

“The position of C14 is that they are not a neo-Nazi group in their activities or in the nature of their activities. They are a nationalist group, but they are by no means neo-Nazi,” said Victor Moroz, C14’s lawyer at a previous court hearing. According to Moroz, what Hromadske called the organisation harms the business reputation of C14.

Hromadske television defends its position and insisted that it did not commit any violations by characterising the organisation as “neo-Nazi.”

UPDATE:

7 August 2019 — A number of international human rights organisations have criticised the decision of the commercial court of Kyiv, the Institute of Mass Information reported. 

Freedom House Ukraine qualified this decision as a dangerous precedent of interference with freedom of opinion and expression in Ukraine. “C14 can contest/deny Hromadske’s characterisation but it is the right of the media to publish their view, in good faith, based on the information they gathered” on C14 and its members, “many of whom declared that they joined the group because of its neo-Nazi orientation”, Matthew Shaaf, director of Freedom House Ukraine said on. Shaaf believes an increase in self-censorship among media in Ukraine could be the most pernicious impact of ruling against Hromadske for calling C14 neo-Nazi. 

Reporters sans Frontiers called the court’s decision “shameful.” Johann Birr, Director of the RSF branch in Eastern Europe and Central Asia, expressed his full support for Hromadske. “A shameful decision, with worrying implications for independent reporting on Ukraine‘s far right groups!” Birr posted on Twitter.

Investigators from Bellingcat said the phrase “neo-Nazi” should be used to describe C14.

Link(s)

https://twitter.com/schfm/status/1159043026485948417

https://twitter.com/RSF_en/status/1158790549131935745

https://en.hromadske.ua/posts/kyiv-court-rules-against-hromadske-in-c14-neo-nazi-case

https://imi.org.ua/en/news/court-ruled-to-refute-report-on-far-right-organization-c14/

https://imi.org.ua/en/news/human-rights-activists-backed-hromadske-in-litigation-with-c14/

https://bellingcat.com/news/uk-and-europe/2019/08/09/yes-its-still-ok-to-call-ukraines-c14-neo-nazi

Categories: Subpoena / Court Order/ Lawsuits, Legal Measures

Source of violation: Government/State Agency/Public official(s)/Political party

Local TV crew assaulted

1 August 2019 – A Kapri TV crew was assaulted by unidentified individuals and a political aid of a parliamentary candidate in Pokrovsk Donetsk region, the Institute of Mass Information reported. 

As a result of the assault, the cameraman received a concussion, his camera and mobile phone belong to journalist Alyona Sobolenko were damaged.  

According to Sobolenko, Vitalii Verbicky, a political aide working for MP candidate Ruslan Trebushkin, broke her smartphone after snatching it from her hands as she attempted to enter the building. Verbicky then forcefully shoved the cameraman into the building where a meeting of the members of the district election commission and the city leadership was taking place. 

The journalists had gone to the offices to investigate why the election commission members were not engaged in recounting a local vote, but instead were meeting with Trebushkin himself behind closed doors. 

Once in the building the cameraman reported he was assaulted and his camera was broken. The individuals also destroyed the memory card containing video, Sobolenko said. The cameraman said he was threatened with further violence and that the men wanted to know if there were additional TV crews outside. The cameraman was prevented from leaving the building for half an hour. 

Sobolenko, who remained in the parking lot, called the police to the scene of the incident. “The police did not arrive at once, I had to call three times, but the officers were in no hurry … We were very worried because we did not know what was going on behind closed doors in the room… We recorded the beating in the hospital, and today called an ambulance again because the cameraman had dizziness, he was diagnosed with a brain injury,” Sobolenko told IMI.

When the police finally arrived, they were prevented from accessing the building by a crowd of men, who blocked the entrance. Subsequently, the police called for reinforcements and freed the cameraman.

The journalists filed a complaint with the police. A criminal case was opened on the article  “obstruction of journalists’ legal activities.”

Link(s): https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=471527833644513

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pCKQz6iqGRE

https://imi.org.ua/news/u-pokrovs-ku-napaly-na-zhurnalistiv-kanalu-kapri-rozbyto-tekhniku-u-operatora-strus-mozku/

Categories: Physical Assault/Injury, Attack to Property, Intimidation

Source of violation: Unknown, Known private individual(s)

[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_basic_grid post_type=”post” max_items=”4″ element_width=”6″ grid_id=”vc_gid:1567522972184-4bcb4f67-949d-0″ taxonomies=”8996″][/vc_column][/vc_row]

Belarus: Press freedom violations August 2019

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]

Index on Censorship’s Monitoring and Advocating for Media Freedom project tracks press freedom violations in five countries: Azerbaijan, Belarus, Russia, Turkey and Ukraine. Learn more.

[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_row_inner][vc_column_inner][vc_custom_heading text=”4 Incidents” use_theme_fonts=”yes”][vc_column_text]

Journalist covering protests in Brest receives messages with threats

21 August 2019 – Journalist Nasta Zakharevich, who has been reporting on the construction of a controversial battery factory located in Brest, received insulting messages and a veiled threat from an account on VKontakte social network.

The VKontakte account is known for often leaving harsh and rude comments under posts authored by opponents of the plant. Earlier an individual with the same name and surname as the VKontakte profile that made the comments had filed a complaint with the police against ecological activist Dzmitry Bekalyuk, who is an opponent of the plant. The compliant accused accused Bekalyuk of “discrediting the Republic of Belarus.”

Link: https://charter97.link/en/news/2019/8/21/345601/

http://greenbelarus.info/articles/21-08-2019/zhurnalistka-kotoraya-pishet-pro-zavod-akb-v-breste-poluchila-soobshcheniya-s

Categories: Online Defamation/Discredit/Harassment/Verbal Abuse, Intimidation                       

Source(s) of violation: Known private individual(s)

State-run newspaper concealed opposition symbol on photo

Belarus Pahonia

Coat of arms associated with Belarusian opposition. It was previously the country’s coat of arms in 1918 and from 1991-1995. (Photo: Wikipedia)

15 August 2019 –  Adzinstva, the local state-owned newspaper in Barysau, altered a photo published on its website of sports coach Viktar Zakharjeu to hide the previous state emblem of Belarus Pahonia, which is regarded by the authorities as an opposition symbol.

Pahonia was the official emblem of the Belarusian Democratic Republic in 1918 and of the Republic of Belarus from 1991 to 1995. It was abolished after Alexander Lukashenko became the country’s president, though it is not officially prohibited and is included on the Republic of Belarus’ cultural heritage list.

Links: https://baj.by/be/content/barysauskaya-rayonka-adzinstva-zamazala-pagonyu-na-svitshoce-geroya-intervyu

http://www.edinstvo.by/ru/news/obshchestvo/item/9153-borisovchanin-stal-pervym-trenerom-v-belarusi-po-krossfitu-v-invalidnoj-kolyaske?fbclid=IwAR3Z1yq6x92K-ZtxfF2DdNn1CY33vQVCCzVTwTZ95e6npWOzB2XDVsbCPh0

Category: Censorship                          

Source(s) of violation: Employer/Publisher/Colleague(s)

Regional government official refused to provide information on communicable disease

14 August 2019 – An official for the Brest regional government refused to provide information on a case of anthrax in the Stolin district to Aksana Brovach, a journalist working for the newspaper Komsomolskaya Pravda v Belarusi.

The official said that all the information was available from on the state-run news agency BelTA: “Can you read? How is it written there?”

The press-service of the Ministry of Agriculture and Food only published an official announcement about the anthrax case on the BelTA news agency.

Link: https://baj.by/be/content/usya-infarmacyya-na-belta-u-bresckim-ablvykankame-admovilisya-davac-kamentar-nakont-vypadku

Category: Blocked Access                      

Source(s) of violation: Government/State Agency/Public official(s)/Political party

After accusations, local independent news outlets investigated by police

13 August 2019 – Ivan Sukharevich, a resident of the town of Drahichyn in the Brest region, sent letters to the National Assembly of Belarus and to the news website Piershy Rehijon editor-in-chief Piotr Huzajeuski. In the letters,  Sukharevich expressed his negative attitude to this online media outlet and particularly to its Drahichyn correspondent Siarhei Hardzijevich.

The writer warned of the serious consequences for the Piershy Rehijon if its journalists try “to shake up the community of our town and region” on the eve of the parliamentary elections and demanded to bring Hardzijevich to responsibility.

Accusations of lying are mentioned many times in the letter, but no evidence was provided for the accusations.

Sukharevich’s complaint was sent to the Drahichyn district police department to be investigated. Hardzijevich got a written response from the police that no evidence of illegal activity had been found.

Link: https://1reg.by/2019/08/13/drogichinskiy-pravdorub-pozhalovalsya-v-parlament-na-korrespondenta-pershaga-reg-yonu/

Categories: Offline Defamation/Discredit/Harassment/Verbal Abuse   

Source(s) of violation: Known private individual(s)[/vc_column_text][/vc_column_inner][/vc_row_inner][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_basic_grid post_type=”post” max_items=”4″ element_width=”6″ grid_id=”vc_gid:1567416168666-b6a972c4-0bc2-10″ taxonomies=”8996″][/vc_column][/vc_row]

Council of Europe’s platform for journalism is a model for other countries

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]Building trust in the media, achieving media sustainability, and ending impunity for murdered journalists are all issues that will be covered during the upcoming International Parliamentary Seminar on Media Freedom, which takes place in London on 9 – 11 September. The Council of Europe’s Platform for the Protection of Journalism and Safety of Journalists is relevant in this regard, as it seeks to gather and disseminate information on serious media freedom issues.

The platform was launched in 2014 in response to growing hostility toward journalists and media freedom in Europe, so as to swiftly and systematically notify the Council of Europe of pertinent issues and to empower it to take timely and coordinated action when necessary.  Index on Censorship is proud to be one of the platform partners. Since 2015 we have submitted and co-sponsored nearly 300 alerts (notifications) to the platform about threats to media freedom and the safety of journalists. 

Index on Censorship contributes to the platform, including by drawing on its Monitoring and Advocating for Media Freedom project, which monitors threats, limitations and violations related to media freedom in Azerbaijan, Belarus, Russia, Turkey and Ukraine. In 2018, 17 alerts were submitted to the platform relating to impunity for murdered journalists. Of these, 15 occurred in the countries covered by Index’s media freedom project: Turkey (2), Azerbaijan (2), Ukraine (5), and Russia (6). 

In advance of the International Parliamentary Seminar on Media Freedom session on regional initiatives, which takes place on 10 September, Index on Censorship expresses the belief that the platform provides a model that could be replicated by other regions. Such a mechanism has the capacity to quickly draw on the knowledge and expertise of media freedom organisations and journalists’ networks, in order to promote media freedom and enhance the safety of journalists. 

Index has noted with extreme concern that the number of alerts about serious threats to journalists’ lives has almost doubled on an annual basis since the launch of the Platform in 2015. We believe that stronger political commitment and practical engagement from politicians and governments is needed to support media freedom around the world. In Council of Europe states, this means that parliamentarians must fully engaging with the platform by ensuring that each alert receives a swift and comprehensive response. This is essential in order for the platform to fulfil its potential. 

While Index on Censorship commends the UK’s commitment to press freedom, we note that since the beginning of 2018 seven Council of Europe alerts have concerned the UK: new counter-terrorism legislation; proposed internet regulation; the arrest of two journalists in September 2018; the killing of a journalist in April 2019; the continued impunity for the killing of a journalist who was murdered in 2001; an attack on a journalist in August 2019; and a government-backed arms fair’s (DSEI) refusal to grant two journalists accreditation. Four of these alerts have yet to receive a response.  

Noting the UK’s role as one of the Council of Europe’s founding members, Index urges the UK to continue engaging with the platform and ensure it takes practical and concrete steps to promote the protection of media freedom in the UK. The UK should aim to set an example for other countries by providing prompt and detailed state replies to alerts.  

Contact: Jessica Ní Mhainín, [email protected]   [/vc_column_text][vc_basic_grid post_type=”post” max_items=”4″ element_width=”6″ grid_id=”vc_gid:1567768197646-934f3ae2-fe70-1″][/vc_column][/vc_row]

Organisations call on Russia to end targeting of journalists covering Moscow protests

Since the electoral authorities rejected several opposition candidates for September’s city council elections, protesters have taken to the streets of Moscow on four consecutive Saturdays. Russian authorities have responded with threats, violence, and detentions.

Journalists who have been reporting on the protests have consistently been targeted. On 27 July 2019, two journalists suffered broken noses after being struck by police, one received injuries to his hands and head after being hit with a police baton, a fourth was beaten in a police van after his arrest, and a fifth received injuries from a police assault.

Police have detained dozens of reporting journalists in the last few weeks, even after they had shown their accreditation. On 3 August 2019, police detained at least fourteen journalists. One journalist was arrested even after police found his accreditation and editorial assignment when they searched him. He was released shortly afterwards, but subsequently re-arrested and taken to a police station. All eight journalists were released the same day without charge.

Several YouTube channels have been broadcasting the protests live, but on 11 August the Russian communications regulator Roskomnadzor published a statement calling on YouTube to stop “advertising” the demonstrations. The regulator said that a failure to respond would be considered “interference in its sovereign affairs” and that Russia would have the right to retaliate.

Several media freedom and journalists’ organisations have filed two alerts with the Council of Europe’s Platform to Promote the Protection of Journalism and Safety of Journalists in relation to Russia’s response to the protests. No reply has so far been received from the Russian Federation.

Jessica Ní Mhainín, Policy Research and Advocacy Officer at Index on Censorship said “Russian authorities seem to be indifferent to the fact that, by targeting protesters and journalists with violence and detentions, they are in flagrant violation of their obligations under international human rights law. But they should bear in mind that their response will only fan the flames of these pro-democracy protests. Journalists are the defenders of our democracy – without journalists and media freedom, there is no democracy”.

Nora Wehofsits, Advocacy Officer at the European Centre for Press and Media Freedom said “The violent crackdown on journalists in Russia is a violation of the freedom of the press and freedom of information. Repressing coverage on protests in favour of fair elections and against police violence and on the oppression of those – re-affirms the need of journalists as watchdogs. It must stop”.

Ravi R. Prasad, Director of Advocacy at the International Press Institute said “Attack on journalists covering democratic protests is against the principles of democracy. The government should allow journalists to do their job without any fear of reprisal and attacks. By attacking journalists Russia is attempting to stifle press freedom and the right of its people to be informed”.

Russia is not the only country where journalists are under threat in connection with protests. Index on Censorship’s 2018 report Targeting the messenger: Journalists on the frontline of protests highlighted the challenges in European countries.

Index on Censorship

European Centre for Press and Media Freedom (ECPMF)

International Press Institute (IPI)

European Federation of Journalists (EFJ)

South East Europe Media Organisation (SEEMO)

Reporters Without Borders (RSF)

Russian Journalists’ and Media Workers’ Union (JMWU)

Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ)


Index on Censorship’s Monitoring and Advocating for Media Freedom project monitors threats, limitations and violations related to media freedom in five countries: Azerbaijan, Belarus, Russia, Turkey and Ukraine for the purpose of identifying and analysing issues, trends and drivers and exploring possible response options and opportunities for advocating media freedom. The project collects and analyses limitations, threats and violations that affect a journalist as they do their job.

As space for independent media shrinks, journalists find themselves under increasing threats of physical violence

  • Independent media sources have been hamstrung by restrictive legislation and police, governmental, and private interference.
  • Physical assaults, detentions, lawsuits, fines, and blocked access are common. Many outlets have chosen to practice self-censorship to protect themselves.
  • Strict new laws limiting press freedom have been introduced, despite having progressive press laws from the 1990s still on the books and a constitutional article guaranteeing freedom of the press.

Out of 175 violations recorded in Russia by the Monitoring and Advocating for Media Freedom project between February and June 2019, 20 were physical assaults that came from political figures, police structures, known private individuals and unknown perpetrators. Several of the cases are egregious examples of how physical violence is used to target journalists in Russia.

Read the full report

Previous report: Legislative restrictions, bomb threats and vandalism are just some of the issues Russian journalists have faced this year

SUPPORT INDEX'S WORK